© 2025 Connecticut Public

FCC Public Inspection Files:
WEDH · WEDN · WEDW · WEDY
WECS · WEDW-FM · WNPR · WPKT · WRLI-FM · WVOF
Public Files Contact · ATSC 3.0 FAQ
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

60 years later, the Voting Rights Act's legacy and its uncertain future

President Lyndon Johnson hands one of the pens used in the signing of the Voting Rights Bill August 6th to the Rev. Martin Luther King at the Capital. The Chief Executive signed the bill 104 years to the day after President Abraham Lincoln travelled to the Capitol to sign a bill freeing Negro slaves who were used to aid the Southern rebellion. In the center are: Representative Claude Pepper (with glasses, D-Fla.) and Rev. Ralph David Abernathy, Dr. King's chief aide.
Bettmann Archive / Getty Images
President Lyndon Johnson hands one of the pens used in the signing of the Voting Rights Bill August 6th to the Rev. Martin Luther King at the Capital. The Chief Executive signed the bill 104 years to the day after President Abraham Lincoln travelled to the Capitol to sign a bill freeing Negro slaves who were used to aid the Southern rebellion. In the center are: Representative Claude Pepper (with glasses, D-Fla.) and Rev. Ralph David Abernathy, Dr. King's chief aide.

“The Voting Rights Act of 1965 made it possible for people to access the simplest tool of democracy.”

That’s how Dr. Khalilah Brown-Dean describes the landmark legislation. She’s a Wesleyan University professor of political science and the host of “Disrupted” on Connecticut Public.

This year marks the 60th anniversary of the Voting Rights Act (VRA), signed into law on Aug.t 6, 1965. But six decades later, its protections face new threats that indicate the fight for voting rights in America is far from over.

A landmark in civil rights legislation

The VRA was enacted to eliminate barriers that had long disenfranchised Black voters in the United States. The struggle leading up to its passage was marked by violent suppression, intimidation and the determined activism of civil rights leaders.

“You had Black veterans returning from fighting overseas,” Brown-Dean said in a conversation with Connecticut Public. “They came home and they couldn't vote.”

That contradiction — serving in the military to defend democracy while being denied the right to participate in it — was one of many injustices that fueled the fight for universal voting rights in the U.S.

Catalysts for change

From sit-ins and boycotts to marches and other tactics, the 1960s saw an explosion of activism to secure voting rights for Black Americans. Those actions risked — and often cost — lives. That included Viola Liuzzo, a Detroit housewife and mother who traveled to Alabama in 1965 to support the movement.

Liuzzo, who was white, was driving civil rights marchers between Montgomery and Selma. Ku Klux Klan members shot and killed Liuzzo in her car. 

“She wanted to be part of the movement for freedom,” Brown-Dean said.

Stories like Liuzzo’s, along with the brutal beatings of activists such as John Lewis on the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, made it clear that federal intervention was necessary. The Voting Rights Act was the result — a law designed to protect citizens from racially discriminatory voting laws and practices.

A transformative impact

The passage of the VRA brought sweeping changes, particularly in the South, where discriminatory literacy tests and poll taxes had long been used to suppress Black voters. In the years following the VRA, voter registration and participation among African Americans surged, paving the way for greater political representation.

“To have someone like John Lewis ... go from being beaten on a bridge in Selma to then becoming a member of the United States House of Representatives, that would not have happened but for the intervention and the commitment of the VRA,” Brown-Dean said.

Modern challenges to the VRA

Despite its historic success, the VRA has been weakened over time, particularly by the 2013 Supreme Court ruling Shelby County v. Holder, which struck down key provisions. Before that decision, certain jurisdictions with histories of voter suppression were required to obtain federal approval before changing their voting laws. The court’s ruling removed that requirement, allowing states to implement voting restrictions without oversight.

“One of the biggest threats to the Voting Rights Act is the unwillingness to enforce its provisions,” Brown-Dean said. “Having a preclearance provision ... [meant] they had to have them pre-cleared with the Department of Justice.”

Without preclearance, some states have enacted measures such as strict voter ID laws and voter roll purges — policies that critics say disproportionately affect minority communities.

The VRA’s broader impact

While the VRA is often associated with African American voting rights, its protections extend far beyond that demographic.

“The Voting Rights Act of 1965 made it possible for people with visual impairments, for people for whom English is not their first language … [and] for indigenous people,” Brown-Dean said.

The act ensured that ballots would be made accessible to non-English speakers and individuals with disabilities, expanding democratic participation.

Hope for the future

Amid some states enacting new voting rights restrictions, advocates are pushing for federal legislation to reinstate and strengthen the VRA’s protections.

“I am hopeful that Americans of good conscience will remember the importance of the history of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and commit to ensuring its future,” Brown-Dean said.

For Brown-Dean, ensuring voting rights for all is central to what makes America … America.

“A commitment to voting rights is not partisan,” she said. “But it is about moving our country closer to her promise and to the ideals of democracy.”

John Henry Smith is Connecticut Public’s host of All Things Considered, its flagship afternoon news program. He's proud to be a part of the team that won a regional Emmy Award for The Vote: A Connecticut Conversation. In his 21st year as a professional broadcaster, he’s covered both news and sports.

Stand up for civility

This news story is funded in large part by Connecticut Public’s Members — listeners, viewers, and readers like you who value fact-based journalism and trustworthy information.

We hope their support inspires you to donate so that we can continue telling stories that inform, educate, and inspire you and your neighbors. As a community-supported public media service, Connecticut Public has relied on donor support for more than 50 years.

Your donation today will allow us to continue this work on your behalf. Give today at any amount and join the 50,000 members who are building a better—and more civil—Connecticut to live, work, and play.

Related Content
Connecticut Public’s journalism is made possible, in part by funding from Jeffrey Hoffman and Robert Jaeger.