© 2024 Connecticut Public

FCC Public Inspection Files:
WEDH · WEDN · WEDW · WEDY
WECS · WEDW-FM · WNPR · WPKT · WRLI-FM · WVOF
Public Files Contact · ATSC 3.0 FAQ
Play Live Radio
Next Up:
0:00
0:00
0:00 0:00
Available On Air Stations

Why Northeast Priorities Take a Backseat in Congress

U.S. Senate Democrats
New York Senator Charles Schumer with fellow Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, at center, and John Feal, at right, at a news conference at the U.S. Capitol Visitor Center on December 18, 2015. Feal aided in the cleanup of Ground Zero.
Congress can tend to load bills down and then cram them through for a vote at the last minute.

New York City Police Commissioner William Bratton and more than a dozen officers traveled to the halls of the U.S. Senate recently to speak up for a program that is universally supported at home. 

Most of the officers worked at Ground Zero or at the Staten Island landfill where the toxic debris was brought. But Congress was refusing to renew a bill covering health care costs for police, fire and other workers who responded to the terrorist attack — also known as the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act.

“Twenty-three New York City police officers perished on that day," Bratton said. "Since that time we have lost another 115. The clock is ticking.”

Despite broad support in the House and Senate, the money was in limbo as Congress wrapped up their work this year. A deal to include the money in a transportation bill fell through. Then the Zadroga act became part of budget negotiations.

“I was so disappointed," said New York Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer, "to hear some of my colleagues use Zadroga as a trading piece, like some bargaining chip.”

Schumer was able to get the funding in the spending bill at the eleventh hour, but he said the health care money should never have been part of those negotiations.

The 9/11 money isn’t the only local priority that’s struggled to make it through Congress. What's important in the Northeast can often take a backseat in Congress.

Earlier this month Congress passed a five-year bill funding transportation — but tri-state lawmakers in both parties had to fight off cuts to bus, train, and other transit.

And then there’s gun control, which has frustrated Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy.

“How cold-hearted is this place?” Murphy asked at a recent event marking the third anniversary of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting.

Three years ago after the Newtown shooting and again this month after San Bernadino, Democrats couldn’t push any gun laws through Congress.

Democrats couldn’t even convince Republicans to support a ban on gun sales to people on federal terror watch lists.

“You have failed to keep us safe," said Po Murray, a Newtown resident who helped found a group seeking more restrictive gun laws. "We are sick and tired of your inaction.”

And Republicans are refusing to consider any gun control legislation now.

It's not just that the largely Democratic tri-state delegation is the minority party. 

“In the past, Chuck Schumer would be an incredibly powerful guy," said Bruce Haynes, a founder of Purple Strategies, a Virginia-based firm which advises both Democrats and Republicans. Schumer is a prodigious fund raiser, and once ran the Senate political committee trying to oust incumbent Republicans.

So the growing influence of huge amounts of money in campaigns has made him enemy number one.

"If you were a Republican Senator who saw millions of dollars… coming down to try to defeat you, that doesn’t necessarily endear you to support initiatives that he’s favoring," Haynes said.

Schumer often gets his way, like boosting a tax break for transit in the budget package passed last week. But Haynes said if Schumer wants something, it becomes a target.

Or sometimes it’s just a matter of different priorities. 

 

Even Conservative Republican Scott Garrett of New Jersey supported more mass transit funding. But House Republicans wanted to cut money for local buses and trains.

Garrett said that’s because the economy in most places in the U.S. doesn’t depend on mass transit.

“Transit is always a difficult issue politically because much of the country is not invested in it as we are,” Garrett said.

Garrett supports paying for transit. But he doesn’t like the way Congress is doing it now: loading bills down and cramming them through Congress at the last minute. He wants bills to work their way through committees and then both chambers of Congress with votes at every step.

 

Garrett has joined other House Republicans voting against those bills on principle — even the transportation bill because it doesn’t say how to pay for all the road and bridge projects inside.

Those votes against local needs aren’t likely to hurt Garrett and other Republicans, said Bruce Haynes with Purple Strategies. Garrett’s been elected seven times to represent northern New Jersey in Congress.

When November rolls around, Haynes said voters will be focused on national issues like terrorism and the economy.

"These are the things that are front and center with voters," Haynes said. "And the hometown issues? Well, we’ll get to them when we get to them.”

The nitty gritty details of how bridges get fixed, commuter trains get funded or how to care for those who sacrificed their health on 9/11 will be long forgotten.

This report was originally published at WNYC.

John O’Connor is a reporter for StateImpact Florida, a project of WUSF, WLRN and NPR covering education. John writes for the StateImpact Florida blog and produces stories for air on Florida public radio stations.

Stand up for civility

This news story is funded in large part by Connecticut Public’s Members — listeners, viewers, and readers like you who value fact-based journalism and trustworthy information.

We hope their support inspires you to donate so that we can continue telling stories that inform, educate, and inspire you and your neighbors. As a community-supported public media service, Connecticut Public has relied on donor support for more than 50 years.

Your donation today will allow us to continue this work on your behalf. Give today at any amount and join the 50,000 members who are building a better—and more civil—Connecticut to live, work, and play.